I'm not certain that the resolution I refer to is a passed resolution, it's unclear from the post I got this from. However, when I scanned the various ILWU locals' web pages, I noticed that none of them announced the anti-China PMFN effort. My suspicion is that disaffection with this effort within the labor mov't is bigger than you estimate (though certainly you're right to assert it's a minority), which would confirm what Doug Henwood reported a few months back from a conversation with an AFL-CIO source. And it would seem to indicate that those opposed to this effort are also not simply the usual sectarian crowd.
Steve
Stephen Philion Lecturer/PhD Candidate Department of Sociology 2424 Maile Way Social Sciences Bldg. # 247 Honolulu, HI 96822
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Andrew English wrote:
> If China PNTR passes, it will be because of the pressures from
> the White House on wavering Dems. The left critics of labor's
> tactics on this issue are a tiny force with no significant impact
> on this battle. The main ally of the corporate elite is Clinton.
>
> -Andy English
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan Newman <nathan.newman at yale.edu>
> To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com>
> Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 4:51 PM
> Subject: Re: Labor Boycotts MCI Fundraising Bash (Re: UAW prez slams
> GoreonChina PNTR
>
>
>
> >The ironies pile up. Too bad the result looks to be a win for the
> >corporate elite on the China PNTR vote.
> >
> >-- Nathan Newman
> >
>
>
>