>From: Rob Schaap <rws at comedu.canberra.edu.au>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>Subject: Re: Allies against fascism?
>Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 16:04:25 +1100
>
>Worth pointing out, too, that D-Day could not have happened but for the
>Eastern Front in general and Germany's enormous reversals at Stalingrad and
>Kursk in particular. So D-Day was not, and could never be, a decisive
>war-ender or a very useful aid to the Soviets (the possibility of it
>probably kept the few really useful divisions left at Rommel's disposal in
>the west, but even they - mebbe 100 000 tried'n'true - couldn't have turned
>the eastern tide after Kursk). By the time a western invasion was
>practically doable, it was more a matter of keeping a chunky buffer zone on
>the continent out of Stalin's mits ...
>
>Cheers,
>Rob.
>
> >Max,
> >
> >>I'm out of my depth on this topic, but how could
> >>the Western Front be 'small'? I would say the
> >>Southern Front was secondary -- all those annoying
> >>mountains in there, but the west? That doesn't
> >>discount the extent of casualties in the East.
> >
> >Looks like Charles beat me to this. Let's put it this way - the Nazi's
> >were already beaten by the time of the Normandy invasion. The Nazi
>forces
> >were solidly on the defensive in the East. Certainly the Western Front
> >hastened the inevitable, but the Germans were defeated in Russia.
> >
> >The western allies helped the Russians by sending them equipment and so
>on,
> >but the lion's share of the credit goes to the Soviets, in my opinion.
> >
> >Brett
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.