Ahh, Carl, as Jack Palance said to Burt Lancaster in "The Professionals" (circa 1965, when discussing each's support, or lack of it, for Zapata in Mexico): you are a true romantic. You want everything, or nothing.
Voting for Nader is not a protest. It's one part of an effort to get people to think about the things that really matter to them, and, ultimately, to confront the trajectory of global capital. It doesn't matter whether Nader can be aptly labeled a "socialist". He raises the issues of "corporations", without mentioning this is the dominant form of capital, and the commodification of everything, without explaining that as the central imperative of capital as self expanding value. That's OK. He's planting important seeds. This is apart from what you or I may think of the solutions he offers.
It's impossible for most people to not respect Nader and the way he has lived his life. As more people understand the WTO's plans, and what NAFTA and GATT mean, the possibilities for what to do about them, and all kinds of other disasters, will multiply, far beyond anything Nader currently suggests. Those possibilities, of course, depend on all of us, not just Nader.
I read your earlier tergiversation about voting for Gore. Don't do it, Carl. Jump aboard and vote for Nader.
RO