A real progressive movement must be based on belief in what is right for society as a whole. Manipulative approaches, including those premised on appeals to material self-interest, become transparent to voters. They are seen as lacking moral foundation. People try to vote that way, if without sufficient information or skill. Even DLC'ers think what they are doing is right, believe it or not.
Nader occupies the high road, as far as moral tone is concerned. Bush is palatable to people because he lacks Gore's too-obvious deviousness and has a simple and appealing message -- you can be trusted to manage your own affairs. It may be b.s., but it's selling.
Nader is well-positioned to move forward, with or without Nathan. The Greens are not the critical factor in this. It's the Ralph Party. The resignation of some Green local officials is testament to their own deficiencies. Better that they sell out as local officials than Members of Congress.
mbs