Summary of Nader analysis

jan carowan jancarowan at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 9 16:04:52 PST 2000


Mr Henwood,

I am free to say rude things about this fine writer because she is not a paid subscriber of a publication with which I am associated. Behind my fighting words there was reasoning which you are free to engage. After listening to Ms Goodman's self proclaimed "critical" interview of Mr Clinton and now reading your "counter" to my criticism of Ms Ehrenreich, it seems clear to me that the poststructuralist critique of reason has led to leftists thinking that rational debate is a form of totalitarianism to be avoided at any cost.

With the same warm greetings of Conan's insult dog, Jan


>From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>Subject: Re: Summary of Nader analysis
>Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 18:49:51 -0500
>
>jan carowan wrote:
>
>>She has done great harm, and should never again be allowed top
>>billing in a leftist publication. Her leftism is truly infantile of
>>the drama queen sort.
>
>Them's fightin' words, comrade. I'm a big fan of Barbara Ehrenreich.
>I think *you're* being the drama queen here, by saying rude things
>about a fine writer and by saying hyperbolic things about the damage
>of a W presidency. Perhaps you should take a stress pill and relax....
>
>Doug

_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list