if the recount of volusia produced the same result as the original count--and that's the report--then that would seem to augur for mismarking of ballots and against electoral fraud or error, correct? that's the first question; and second, has anyone gotten a look at the volusia county ballot?
-----Original Message----- From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of kelley Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:57 PM To: pulp-culture at Infothecary.ORG; dc-stuff at dis.org; lbo-talk at lists.panix.com Cc: teachsoc at vance.irss.unc.edu; POLITICS at ALOO.NETAXS.COM; pen-l at galaxy.csuchico.edu Subject: Velousia stats on line
I took the liberty of posting Andy Martin's analysis of the new Velousia Co. numbers that came in after they found more votes in that County. Andy argues that the problems spotted with the Buchanan vote can also be found among other third party candidates. He suggested technical error with the ballot punching system or fraud.
You can download it as at .doc at http://home1.get.net/kwalker2/Vote2000/stats.html
oh and, for fun, this cracked me up. but then, i'm a little punchy right now! :) http://www.tvdance.com/bush-gore/
kelley
Kelley Walker Researcher/Writer Interpact Inc. www.interpactinc.com