>Note also the
>back-handed support for the revisionist social-imperialist
>neo-capitalist so-called Peoples Republic of China.
In an otherwise flawless and compelling analysis, this deficient formulation sticks out like the proverbial sore thumb (made sore, no doubt, through repeated dull and dangerous labor under the whip of capital): the proper Spart formulation would be "like an imperialist dagger aimed straight at the heart of the deformed workers state of China."
Doug