>
>
>I was talking about the claim, by Casey, that H denied the
>Rawandan genocide. If anybody can support that, without
>resort to LSD and the Jefferson Airplane, I'd be interested in
>your evidence.
From: LeoCasey at aol.com
Received: from LeoCasey at aol.com
by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.24.) id a.4b.1a31f78 (4322)
for <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com>; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:02:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4b.1a31f78.270cae7b at aol.com> Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:02:03 EDT Subject: Re: Rwandan Genocide To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Language: en
"Jim Heartfield's comments on this topic (reproduced below) dismiss the very reality of the Rwandan genocide, "evenhandedly" condemning both its perpetrators and its victims, one million of which are dead. "
i don't see how leo was calling jim a "denier" but rather suggesting that his even-handed condemnation was a kind of relativism that he found intolerable. i believe we've had this debate many times over. @@
all this uhm trotting out of ancient marxist history and war wounds is pathetic, really. it sure as heck alienates me since i don't especially care what the trots did to the sparts or the sparts to the leninists or wotevA. how friggin necrophiliac can y'all get?