This was not the point I tried to make. I argued that for the most part the Nobel prize is awarded not for solving some pernicious technical problems, but because the solutions re-affirm conventional values or save politically correct theories from empirical refutation.
To be sure, this problem is not limited to the Nobel prize in economics, but to Nobel prize in general. Since it is impossible to objectively determine what constitutes the greatest contribution to science in general, let alone such a contribution during the past year, such annual events are but beauty contests, or rather rituals bestowing seals of political correctness.
The Nobel prize money would be better spent on genuine advancement of knowledge, say, funding statistical reporting in developing countries.
wojtek