Michael Yates
Charles Brown wrote:
>
> >>> LeoCasey at aol.com 10/13/00 01:49PM >>>
> In a message dated 10/13/2000 1:18:22 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> owner-lbo-talk-digest at lists.panix.com writes:
>
> << I thought _The Rosenberg File_ was holding up quite well...
>
>
> (((((((((((
>
> CB: But it wouldn't have been good for humanity for the U.S. to be the only
> country with nuclear weapons, no ? I mean especially from the standpoint of
> the Koreans and Viet Namese or even the Soviets. But even the Cubans. What
> would have become of the post WWII colonial independence movement , if the
> U.S. had a monopoly on the bomb ? >>
>
> Talk about argument by non sequitur. What does the response have to do with
> the original contention? One could grant the argument of the response in its
> entirety, and it would still have no impact on whether or not Radosh was
> right that Julius -- but not Ethel -- Rosenberg did participate in espionage,
> or that the trial was not a fair one.
>
> ((((((((((((
>
> CB: Gee, you aren't too good at logic. I didn't say anything about whether or not Julius Rosenberg did it. What I implied ( but you are too dense to get) is that if he did do it, wasn't it a good thing ?