> Left can't be against GM for technical reasons since all bio-scientists
> agree that direct manipulation of genes is far more efficient and reliable
> than the old-fashioned inbreeding for desired traits. they agree, too,
that
> there are absolutely NO differences in nutritive value of GM food over any
> other agricultural methods.
>
I would like to see unbiased empiracle evidence for this.
> on balance, GM foods offer the third world better food sources than
> formerly, if the GM providers can get the food to the people who need it.
>
It's untested, possible harmful, and against the wishes of the majority of
consumers.
> so what's the beef? because GM undermines traditional farming methods and
> its "workers"? because successful GM food might favor capitalist
production
> methods that might undermine the interests of its adversaries?
>
> norm
>
>
>
>
>