Genovese
JKSCHW at aol.com
JKSCHW at aol.com
Wed Oct 18 12:48:25 PDT 2000
No, Kirk is not taken seriously in mainstream political science or political
theory, if my time in the Michigan polisci dep't in the mid-late 80's is any
indication. I think he's viewed as a reactionary crank, a boring National
Review type. --jks
In a message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2000 2:50:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Doug
Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> writes:
<< Michael Hoover wrote:
>Russell Kirk
How seriously is he taken outside the hardcore conservative camp? Do
mainstream political science types read him? Back in my Party of the
Right days he was revered almost as a prophet.
Doug
>>
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list