Genovese

JKSCHW at aol.com JKSCHW at aol.com
Wed Oct 18 12:48:25 PDT 2000


No, Kirk is not taken seriously in mainstream political science or political theory, if my time in the Michigan polisci dep't in the mid-late 80's is any indication. I think he's viewed as a reactionary crank, a boring National Review type. --jks

In a message dated Wed, 18 Oct 2000 2:50:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com> writes:

<< Michael Hoover wrote:


>Russell Kirk

How seriously is he taken outside the hardcore conservative camp? Do mainstream political science types read him? Back in my Party of the Right days he was revered almost as a prophet.

Doug

>>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list