>
>kelley flamed
>> > i've seen ken get flamed too many times on this list ...
>>
>> > the flames are of a wholly different kind than the simplistic... what
>> i call
>>substantive flames.
ken flamed
>>I can't tell if I've been flamed or not? Ken gets flamed too many
>>times... but
>>they are substantive, not simplistic. I'll have to pull out Truth and
>>Method to
>>figure that one out.
>
kelley flamed:
>KMA
>
>when you have a point, get back to me.
so ken, you haven't gotten back to me. but let me just get back to you, then. i take it your little bit about the bank and diversity (vast was slippage for midst) had something to do with this:
>And this falls on the heels of Chris's comments about subversion. By
>"forcing"
>the issue of universality - we actually *create* a universalist discourse.
ken please show me that you understand how ludicrous this statement is. i beg of you. with fuckme pumps on, i beg of you to please acknowledge that you understand the problem with this claim.
kelley