>
>
>Point of Order <dc-stuff convention--- and heck i don't even know if i'm
>using it correctly, whatever!>: no one here argued for gun control but
>argued that your reasons for supporting the 2a were incoherent or your
>claim that the supremes have seen it as an individual right, not collective
>were incoherent, wrong, etc. it doesn't *necessarily* follow that folks
>would advocate gun control. although i'm sure some here do, a number of
>folks think about law in rather lacanian terms, even if they don't use that
>description. (forbidding something just makes people want it more, to put
>it simply) i think only justin was heading in the direction and openly
>declaring that he supports draconian gun control or close to it.
>
>kelley
>
_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.