>i keep trying to understand exactly where kelley is coming from.
Try reading her, rather than attempting to interpret her after reading 2 or 3 lines.
>ultimately, kelley's problem is that she is trying to wedge
>hacker/coders into a comfortable paradigm so that she can
>explain (or understand?) it.
Everyone can be fitted into a box, from an "other" point of view. Is the box a good fit? Not always. Is the practice inadvisable? Not always.
>it is not professional. it is
>*not* peer-reviewed (the whole concept of beta-testing is
>contrary to the elite nature of peer-review).
Go ask on c'punks, if anyone actually reviews the source for pgp when http://www.pgpi.org posts it. It may not meet your standards, but then, it isn't a rocketship bound for the moon (and back) with a live manifest, either.
>ac
>
>
>
>
> '''
> (0 0)
> ----oOO----(_)----------
>| the geek shall |
>| inherit the earth |
> -----------------oOO----
> |__|__|
> || ||
> ooO Ooo
>
I've heard that before. It was followed by ", the bold shall inherit everything else."
Reese