McReynolds/Hollis lead Gore, Bush, Nader in non-partisan poll

[Gregory Geboski]

I checked it, too. I got Nader and saw the list, and on "votes so far" 
McReynold was nowhere to be seen. Frankly, I see one explanation: McReynolds 
got purged. By definition, Americans cannot want socialism. Therefore, his 
presence must have been wrong, by definition.


>From: James Baird <jlbaird3 at yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>Subject: Re: McReynolds/Hollis lead Gore, Bush, Nader in non-partisan poll
>Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
>
>OK, I don't get it.  I went and took the quiz, but
>McReynolds wasn't even on the list when I finished.
>They stuck me with Nader...
>
>Jim Baird
>
> > > In a survey published on September 24 on its
> > non-partisan "SpeakOut.Com"
> > list of candidate ratings, out of 208,941 people who
> > had taken the
> > survey of candidates on SelectSmart.com the
> > following ranking suggests
> > what might happen if the Socialist Party campaign
> > were being run on
> > anything like the funds of the other minor party
> > campaigns.
> >
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
>http://photos.yahoo.com/

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.