--BD
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Geboski" <ggeboski at hotmail.com> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 6:18 PM Subject: Re: McReynolds/Hollis lead Gore, Bush, Nader in non-partisan poll
: I checked it, too. I got Nader and saw the list, and on "votes so far"
: McReynold was nowhere to be seen. Frankly, I see one explanation: McReynolds
: got purged. By definition, Americans cannot want socialism. Therefore, his
: presence must have been wrong, by definition.
:
: >From: James Baird <jlbaird3 at yahoo.com>
: >Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
: >To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
: >Subject: Re: McReynolds/Hollis lead Gore, Bush, Nader in non-partisan poll
: >Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 14:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
: >
: >OK, I don't get it. I went and took the quiz, but
: >McReynolds wasn't even on the list when I finished.
: >They stuck me with Nader...
: >
: >Jim Baird
: >
: > > > In a survey published on September 24 on its
: > > non-partisan "SpeakOut.Com"
: > > list of candidate ratings, out of 208,941 people who
: > > had taken the
: > > survey of candidates on SelectSmart.com the
: > > following ranking suggests
: > > what might happen if the Socialist Party campaign
: > > were being run on
: > > anything like the funds of the other minor party
: > > campaigns.
: > >
: >
: >__________________________________________________
: >Do You Yahoo!?
: >Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free!
: >http://photos.yahoo.com/
:
: _________________________________________________________________________
: Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
:
: Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
: http://profiles.msn.com.
: