Back in 1967 or 66 there was a conference in Ann Arbor of radicals in the professions. At one of the plenaries a grad student in econ from Stony Point posed the following question: Are we radical professionals or are we radicals who earn our living in a profession? I was not a Marxist then, though it was a panel led by a young attorney from Berkeley that set me on the way.) I decided at once that I was _not_ a radical teacher, but I was a radical who happened to be a teacher. Compare "radical teacher" and "radical Walmart clerk." "Radical teacher" clearly carries implications that "radical Walmart clerk" does not. But "radical who teaches" does catch that flavor.
It is understandable that those who have trained themselves in literature or sociology or linguistics would long, like the juggler, to give to the working class what they have to give. But the working class will not smile. Only professionals who repudiate the basic principles of their profession can make that profession a service to the class.
Carrol