In the second instance, the man inquiring was the head of our lab. He phrased the question "What's the deal about this corn, isn't it just another case of the government butting into our lives?" I was more measured in my response this time, and just said something like, "Well, there actually are some issues, and I could bring you some information..." Then I went home and got the least inflammatory materials I could find (i.e., stuff that stuck to the science and didn't talk about how it was a plot by big business to corner ag production). A week later, he stopped me in the hall to tell me that he'd never realized there were some serious concerns with gmo's, and the articles had been very helpful.
In a message dated 01-04-24 14:17:18 EDT, you write:
<< Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:19:44 -0400
From: Archer.Todd at ic.gc.ca
<<<Subject: Re: Fw: Strange FTAA Dream
W. Kiernan wrote:
Whereas lots of ordinary workers, including many of these Walmart clerks
of yours (who, you'd think, would at least hazily understand that their
interests are directly opposed to the interests of the investing class),
they simply blow you off when you try to discuss political issues with
them - they don't want to hear it at all. Then later on they vote for a
right-winger because that candidate promises them vague improvements in
"public morality," or because the candidate dresses well, or because,
due to big-budget TV ads like the Willie Horton one or the black hands
one, they associate his opponent with those minority groups they so
despise. How do you get through to these spoprts fans who refuse to
listen to a word you say?
Like Carrol said, you must pick your targets. And what better way to pick
your target then "fire for effect" e.g. try to discuss political issues
with an individual or group and see what their response is; if positive,
continue with discussion; if negative, don't bother them for the time being.