One curious irony, well worth discussing, is that the criminal justice system in the US punishes people with draconian prison sentences and focuses its efforts on those categories of antisocials who are, very arguably, least susceptible to a cost-benefit analysis. Do we see many industrial polluters doing time? The class bias of the criminal justice system tends to focus punishment away from the parts of the population where it could do the most good.
Christopher Rhoades Dÿkema
Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:
> At 07:29 PM 4/22/01 -0500, Carrol wrote:
> >Actully I've never given a thought to this question. And I presume any
> >social order takes whatever steps are necessary, under given conditions,
> >to protect itself. It is punishment, which is just a polite name for
> >revenge, that I object to. I agree with Orwell that under some
> >circumstances you can achieve good results by killing people, but if one
> >must kill, it ought not to be for such an obscene reason as punishment.
>
> Carroll, you seem to forget the deterrent effect of punishment. In fact,
> we use negative sanctions (i.e. punishments by another name), such as
> frowning, avoidance, withdrawal of affection, spanking, slapping, etc. in
> every day interaction to deter certain forms of behavior. Th eonly
> difference between this and the criminal justice system is that the latter
> uses a much more formalized froms of sanctions than those used in everyday
> life.
>
> We may debate whether a particular sanction deters a particuluar form of
> behaviour (an issue most frequently raised in connection with capital
> punishment or formal vs informal sanctions) - but it would be utterly naive
> to deny the pivotal role punishment plays in maintaining social norms and
> rules.
>
> wojtek