>Doug says:
>
>>Why is "Africa" the whole, and not Nigerians, or Zulus, or whatever
>>sub-group you want to name?
>
>Economy of scale, for instance. The bigger the better, as long as
>the territory is solidly unified & well governed. The logic of
>capitalist development gave an impetus toward the European Union.
>Why not the African Union?
I'm all for that. But that wasn't the issue - it was kicking the white people out of Africa. I wondered why black/white, why all of Africa (and is that just sub-Saharan, or North Africa too?) I recall the Hutus and the Tutsis tried to kick each other out of Rwanda, with rather horrid consequences.
Doug