I don't consider it to be a priori preposterous. This will certainly sound quite naive (indeed, "preposterous") to many here, but your allusion to the US doing "what's in its imperial interest" seems to be more applicable to the Kissengeresque realism of the far-right than the liberal interventionism espoused by Madeline Albright.
> As far as cheap shots go, there are few cheaper than to say that
> opponents of the U.S./NATO fly-by in Yugoslavia lack your
> exquisite sensitivity to the plight of the Muslims of the region.
>
> Doug
Your allusion to my "exquisite sensitivity" is itself a cheap shot (albeit an excellent one). Many on the left (including, I'm guessing, yourself) didn't downplay the scope of the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia. However, I'm troubled when Z Magazine prints articles touting Milosevic as a good democrat.
-- Luke