Ian Murray wrote:
>
>
> ===========
> Totally agree. At the same time we need to understand that
> egalitarianism and non-authoritarianism is not consistent with
> vanguardism of any kind.
>
Is it inconsistent with leadership of any kind? I'm not sure how you conceive "vanguardism." I would not assume that positing the need for some sort of vanguard (in some sense) could be labeled as an independent "ism."
Carrol