The Proof of the Pudding...Re: lbo-talk-digest V1 #4729
Yoshie Furuhashi
furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Mon Aug 13 11:36:44 PDT 2001
>>kelley wrote:
>>>You need a normative ground in order to distinquish between
>>>science and ideology...
>>
>>that suggests there are definitive distinguishing features
>>between science and ideology. are there? what are they?
>>
>> --ravi
>
>the proof of the pudding is in the eating and the eating is in the future,
>
>horkheimer and adorno, _the eclipse of reason_
That's an argument against the alleged need for a normative ground a
la Habermas in the present, though. For all we know, we may be
universally eating a better pudding in the future if we are less
obsessed with making a universalist pudding in the present.
Yoshie
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list