"Observable relationships"? was Re: Brett and ...

Kelley kwalker2 at gte.net
Mon Aug 13 21:22:31 PDT 2001


At 08:01 PM 8/11/01 -0500, Carrol Cox wrote:


>I agree with the whole of your post, but this part is quite wrong.
>Relationships are _not_ observable.

an electromagnetic field can't be observed either. what you see is the _effects_ of that electromagnetic field. ditto for a buttload of other phenom studied by natural scientists.

btw, see that bhaskar dude again on that one. i got that from him! :)



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list