"Observable relationships"? was Re: Brett and ...

[Kelley]

At 08:01 PM 8/11/01 -0500, Carrol Cox wrote:

>I agree with the whole of your post, but this part is quite wrong.
>Relationships are _not_ observable.


an electromagnetic field can't be observed either. what you see is the 
_effects_ of that electromagnetic field. ditto for a buttload of other 
phenom studied by natural scientists.


btw, see that bhaskar dude again on that one. i got that from him! :)