Post-Galbraoith Warfare- Bombing can win wars

Michael Perelman michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
Sat Dec 1 08:41:08 PST 2001


No, it is not all right. The Dresden-Hiroshima came late in the game after the war was pretty well lost.

On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 02:21:16AM -0500, Michael Pollak wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> > WW II bombing was mostly directed at military sites;
>
> Michael, I don't think this is at all right. The main strategic goal of
> strategic bombing was enemy morale, and their main targets were not
> civilian infrastructure but civilians themselves: Hamburg, Dresden, Tokyo,
> Hiroshima.
>
> The American talked about economic chokepoints for much of the war, but
> after that didn't work and once they had air control they acted exactly
> like the RAF. The Allies dropped 2,700,000 tons of bombs on Germany; 72
> percent were dropped between July 1, 1944 and the collapse of Germany. And
> the major weapon during that period was the incendary bomb. We were
> intentionally slaughtering civilians to make them give up, pure and
> simple. The conclusion drawn after the war was that it didn't work. Any
> more than it V-2's made Londoners want to give up.
>
> Well, okay, Hiroshima and Nagasaki worked. But they're the exception that
> proves the rule.
>
> Michael
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> Michael Pollak................New York City..............mpollak at panix.com
>

-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list