> how asymmetrically undialectical :-)
>
> (((((((((
>
> CB: How now , here goes, in the main how about leaving it to a
> proletarian , not bourgeois, international regime to establish the
> social network ?
>
> Whether to link or delink is a concrete question for each country and
> region based on its impact in a strategy of destroying imperialism
> 2001 and promoting proletarian internationalism 2001. There is no
> stereotypical, one correct tactic for every place. Different
> countries and different activists are experimenting with different
> tactics, many and most without fullblown socialist goals, but with
> objectively anti-imperialist goals as they respond to imperialism's bite.
>
> But we can make a cautionary rule of thumb, the social and political
> international networks established by neo-liberal imperialism are not
> likely to be conducive to developing anti-imperialist solidarity for
> fighting unities ( units that fight) against imperialism. The
> imperialists are more aware than we are of the potential for world
> revolution in the new links between working peoples of different
> countries and regions.
**********
"Hegemony is like a pillow" Robert Cox
The elites are simply having a millenium fit of paranoia; there's nothing like the prospect of attempting to think a decade or a century hence, seeing nothing but declining ecological systems in one's forcasts and workers in some parts of the world realizing it too, to give them a case of anxiety. I can't wait until Washington DC has it's first 117-120 degree week with 99% humidity and no one can go outside [just like in Chile a few weeks ago] because of UV radiation.
Ian non-dues paying member of Alaskans for Global Warming