As an LBO-Talk-convicted left-conservative, I feel obliged to speak up on my behalf on this one. Now, you might reckon indignation like that expressed against MacMuck et al constitutes a conservative-elitist rejection of the proletarian and her ways (I'm not sure this is exactly what you reckon, Doug - haven't quite got your position fixed yet - but this is what I currently think you're saying), but it does no such thing.
Consider "Never Mind The Bollocks". Vulgar, coarse ... and, well, bloody gorgeous. Consider now the aptly-named "Great Rock'n'Roll Swindle" - the Pistols' second album. Vulgar, coarse ... and, well, vacuously humdrum. Whatever the difference between the two sets, it's not anything to do with vulgarity or coarseness. I think it's to do with the recognition, on the part of corporate capital, of the potential of the new genre; corporate capital's consequent ham-fisted take-over of the process; and mebbe a bit of resentful response on the part of the Boyz. The first album was sorta like what laCapra calls 'popular culture', and the second was more what he calls 'mass culture'.
This is, I submit, why the most oft-uttered sentence in the English language is, "not as good as their first album, though".
So, wog-burgers, Never Mind the Bollocks, street-soccer, buskers, grafitti artists, and Jefferson Airplane are GOOD ...
And BigMacs, Rock'n'Roll Swindle, beach volleyball, The Three Tenors, billboards, and Jefferson Starship are BAD!
Honestly, if everyone just listened to me, all this critique stuff would be a lot simpler and we'd have the revo outa the way before you could say 'diffusional pataphysical re-narrativisation of the decentred subject absolving itself before the simulacra of phallocentric differance." Maybe a little sooner ...
Cheers, Rob.
>
>Before they shut it down, why not Napster a ditty called "Frank
>Sinatra" by Miss Kittin and The Hacker. Vulgarity can be so beautiful!
>
>Doug