> to argue that there is no need for discussion because we know the answer
as
> to what the left is, however, is to make it into a religion. similarly,
> suggesting that we don't need to discuss it because it's pointless is
> turning it into a religion.
Uh, yeah. Huh?
> >So Matt Cramer makes libertarian arguments on a "left" list. Who
> >the fuck cares?
>
> obviously you don't.
No, I don't. Not that provincial.
> two words: filter me.
I'll give it a go, but I doubt your clunky arguments will pass easily through.
DP