Catherine, can't you read? was Re: No Sex Please - We'rePost-Human!

Catherine Driscoll catherine.driscoll at adelaide.edu.au
Sat Feb 17 22:50:34 PST 2001


Carrol writes:


> You & Catherine both seem to see the ideal of human life to be the
> dot-like isolation, as marx puts it in the _grundrisse_, of the
> laborerin bourgeois society.

I see know such thing. Dependence presumes a hierarchy which I do not understand to be inherent to being human at all. That does not leave the only other options Sartre or Rousseau. What about attachment? Why would attachment have to be thought as anything to do with dependence? Dependence is a product of a range of social institutions. Ways of thinking about parent-child relations for example.

Catherine



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list