> >For those who argued that who appoints to the Supreme Court does not
> >matter,
> >I wonder how many more step-by-step guttings of the ability to pass
> >progressive legislation it will take to convince you.
>
> Nathan, no one, and especially not me, argues that that judiciary does not
> matter. But here's one for you: how much are Ginsberg and Breyer worth if we
> pay with the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, the end of
> "welfare as we know it," GATT and NAFTA? Just for starters with Clinton
> initiatives. --jks
**************
GATT goes back to Bretton Woods, the heavy lifting to get NAFTA into orbit was Bush I [a case of crony capitalism arrangements if there ever was one with his Mexican buddies].
Nathan seems to be arguing with himself in that post, no?
Ian