BK on "identity"
Doug Henwood
dhenwood at panix.com
Tue Feb 27 14:37:28 PST 2001
On Patrick Bond's urging, I picked up a copy of Boris Kagarlitsky's
trilogy, published by Pluto. In The Return of Radicalism, we learn
(just after an approving quote from Todd Gitlin): "All identity is
social, but class is the quintessence of the social. Unlike race,
sex, culture, or place of birth, class cannot be determined except by
the positions of the individual in society, and cannot be reproduced
except through participation in the functioning of the economic
system" (p. 95).
Really? I don't see how anyone in the U.S. or South Africa could
claim that race is irrelevant to one's participation in the economic
system, or how anyone on the planet could claim that sex/gender
wasn't deeply tied to participation in the economic system. Basically
this sounds like the same old class v. identity crap that I thought
was on its deathbed.
So Patrick, what's so exciting about this trilogy? Where should I
turn for inspiration other than p. 95?
Doug
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list