Rightward ho!

Justin Schwartz jkschw at hotmail.com
Wed Jan 3 08:32:59 PST 2001


Why shouldn't he? The Dems are going to let him get away with it, aren't they, in the name of bipartisanship? All the more reason to support them, eh, Nathan? --jks


>
>The Bush crowd seems to be doing a variation on The Treasure of Sierra
>Madre: "Mandate? We don't need no stinkin' mandate!" From today's Slate:
>
>"The Washington Post reports that 'President-elect Bush is defying
>predictions of a bipartisan government and instead is naming a Cabinet that
>is little different from one he would have chosen if he had won a
>resounding
>victory, Bush advisers said.' Bush 'has determined that the best way to
>establish his legitimacy despite his messy victory is to lead as if he had
>a
>mandate. So he is nominating thoroughbred conservatives to his Cabinet
>instead of appeasing Democrats with moderates, and is vowing to take his
>campaign platform to Capitol Hill undiluted even though his allies there
>are
>urging him to start with chewable bites.'"
>
>Carl
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>

_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list