rationale behind hate crimes

Daniel Davies d_squared_2002 at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Jan 11 09:10:41 PST 2001


--- Justin Schwartz <jkschw at hotmail.com> wrote: > Advocacy of illegal conduct can only be prohibited,
> consistewntly with the
> first amendment, if the harm is immanent. "Kill that
> kike!" (addressed to an
> angry mob) is punishable. "All the kike should be
> killed!" (in a leaflet) is
> not. See Brandenburg v. Ohio, a 1966 S.Ct case.
> --jks
>

Local statute, your mileage may vary. In the UK, under our Race Relations Act, you can land up in the clanger for "Incitement to Racial Hatred", which would (and regularly has) indeed caught people for distributing Justin's hypothetical leaflet. Surprisingly, despite this complete abrogation of our constitutional rights, we are not yet a totalitarian hell-hole.

Count me in with the supporters of banning the Nazis and KKK, by the way.

dd

===== “It is necessarily part of the business of a banker to maintain appearances and to profess a conventional respectability which is more than human. Life-long practices of this kind make them the most romantic and the least realistic of men” -- JM Keynes

____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list