>To single out the migration ideology of the Jews as uniquely racist is not
>anti-Israel but anti-Jewish. It is the specific end-product of that
>migration, the Israeli state that deserves the criticism, so casual attacks
>on "Zionism" rather than the Israeli state just melds anti-semitism into
the
>criticism.
Pardon my ignorance, but wasn't Zionism not accepted by all Jews when it was first instituted (as much as National Socialism wasn't accepted by all Germans)? And wasn't it started to create, or recreate, the "traditional" Jewish "homeland"? I don't know what the creators of Zionism proposed to do about the people who were already living there, anybody else have that info? (Michael P., you seem to burning up the search engines . . . .)
Todd