Yes, thank you for bringing this up. I read a history of zionism last year. One of the most striking things about this book (which supported everything you say) was the map of Europe shown at the beginning. It listed the dates when Jews were politically emancipated in Europe: the dates were 1789 in France; 1848 (I think in Germany); 1917 in the former Soviet Union. In other words, the emancipation of the Jews coincided with the major European revolutionary struggles. The book argued that this process of emancipation was threatening to those Jews whose power/status was guaranteed by Jews remaining a second-class, ghetto-bound people. To these people, transforming the ghetto into a colony/state serving the interests of the imperialist powers was an ideal solution. When you consider that the emancipation of the Jews did create the conditions under which Karl Marx, Freud, Einstein, Wittgenstein, etc could develop their thought and practice, you can see how some Jews were threatened not only by oppression, but by its opposite. The creation of the state of Israel is always said to have been necessary because of the oppression. It is equally true to say that it was necessary for the opposite reason: the emancipation of the jews put into question too many orthodoxies for the comfort of some.
Joanna Bujes