The Democrats screwed Labor long before Nader ran. They've had the opportunity to modify labor laws to make them more favorable to unions but haven't done it. It was that failure which made the above incident possible.
And blaming Nader for the Dem's loss of the election is absurd (it's equally absurd to expect a union-buster like Nader to worry too much about supporting unions). The Socialist Party and Worker's World got enough votes to swing the tide between Gore & Bush, why don't you blame McReynolds? In an election this close you can single out and blame virtually and group you like. If Gore weren't so spineless things could be different. In Florida, more democrats defected to the Republicans then to Nader. You should be blaming the Democrats & Republicans for the above, not Nader.
Joe R. Golowka JoeG at ieee.org Anarchist FAQ - http://www.anarchistfaq.org
"The fact is that Liberal-Democracy seldom voices any arguments against Anarchism as such -- other than relying on prejudice -- because its objections are purely authoritarian and unmask the innate Statism and authoritarianism of liberalism. Nowadays conservatives like to appropriate the name 'libertarianism' to describe themselves as if they were more receptive to freedom than socialists. But their libertarianism is confined to keeping the State out of interfering in their business affairs. Once anarchism makes it plain that it is possible to have both social justice and to dispense with the State they are shown in their true colours. Their arguments against State socialism and Communism may sound 'libertarian', but their arguments against Anarchism reveal that they are essentially authoritarian. That is why they prefer to rely upon innuendo, slanders, and false reporting, which is part of the establishment anti-anarchism, faithfully supported by the media." - Albert Meltzer