> The only candidate to take explicitly pro-labor, anti-corporate stands in
> the election was -- Nader. The only candidate to blast neoliberalism's
> deadly assault on the planet was -- Nader. The only candidate to call our
> two-parties-with-half-a-brain system as the farce it truly is was --
> Nader. The only candidate with a principled activist track record of doing
> what he said was -- Nader.
That's not true. McReynolds and many other third party canidates took the same positions, usually much more radical ones.
Joe R. Golowka JoeG at ieee.org Anarchist FAQ - http://www.anarchistfaq.org
"The fact is that Liberal-Democracy seldom voices any arguments against Anarchism as such -- other than relying on prejudice -- because its objections are purely authoritarian and unmask the innate Statism and authoritarianism of liberalism. Nowadays conservatives like to appropriate the name 'libertarianism' to describe themselves as if they were more receptive to freedom than socialists. But their libertarianism is confined to keeping the State out of interfering in their business affairs. Once anarchism makes it plain that it is possible to have both social justice and to dispense with the State they are shown in their true colours. Their arguments against State socialism and Communism may sound 'libertarian', but their arguments against Anarchism reveal that they are essentially authoritarian. That is why they prefer to rely upon innuendo, slanders, and false reporting, which is part of the establishment anti-anarchism, faithfully supported by the media." - Albert Meltzer