Thanks for the notice, this reconfirms my determination not to read Law's Empire. Dworkin should know better. He fails to grasp the way in which questions of objectivity can be rethought not in a Kantian transcendental schema, but through pragmatics, which takes into consideration the propositional content of a expression, the normative claims that it raises, the intelligibility of the speaker (and capacity of the hearer) and the sincerity of the participants.
ken