A positive moral judgment ascribes a moral predicate to an act or person or event; a negative one denies such an ascription.
I wonder why he does not include legal persons such as corporations? Do acts include corporate acts I wonder? Certainly ordinary discourse involves moral judgments re corporations, teams, and the like all the time. Is there some conceptual problem here?
Cheers, Ken Hanly
----- Original Message ----- From: Luke Benjamin Weiger <lweiger at umich.edu> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 7:49 PM Subject: Re: Ethical foundations of the left
> As much as I hate to go over my posting limit for the day, here's an
> interesting piece by Ronald Dworkin some of you might enjoy:
> http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/dworkin/papers/objectivity.html
>
> -- Luke
>