Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
> > > >Segregation is the historical reality for disabled persons, and not
> >> >coincidentally the proliferation of institutions coincides with the
> >> >rise of capitalism.
> >> >Marta
> >>
> >> That makes sense, but in that case, our argument would be _for_ home
> >> care necessary for assisted living, directly or indirectly provided
> >> by the state, & improvement of it for both disabled persons &
> >> care-giving workers. Clarifying what disabled persons & care-giving
> >> workers need helps us better than a broad-brush criticism of the
> >> medical profession tout court.
> >>
> >> Yoshie
> >========
> >Ah, but we've just displaced the coercion; for we are saying that some
> >'home' must assume responsibility/liability for the care of disabled
> >citizens and this becomes problematic if said citizens are nonetheless
> >capable of exercising their liberty to refuse treatment and shelter.
> >
> >Ian
>
> By home care I don't mean that the disabled will be taken care of by
> their family members. Most likely, many adult disabled individuals
> desire to live independently -- alone or with friends or with
> partners -- of their family members, just as many adult non-disabled
> individuals do so.
>
> If you have an alternative in your mind, you might tell us.
>
> Yoshie