DN

[LeoCasey at aol.com]

Yes, and I would agree on that assessment. I have a lot of respect for Juan 
Gonzalez and especially Major Owens, whom I have known personally for many 
years, and their interventions had won me over to the 
anti-Pacifica/anti-Utrice position. But I found Murdock quite convincing, 
because a lot of what he said resonated with my impression of WBAI politics 
over the years. The debate gave me some second thoughts. 

 
> The buzz on the Pacifica lists is that this morning's debate on 
> Democracy Now between boardmember (and corporate lawyer at the 
> unionbusting firm Epstein Becker and Green <http://www.ebglaw.com>) 
> John Murdock (defender of HMOs 
> <http://www.ebglaw.com/atty_bio_59.htm>) and former DN co-host Juan 
> Gonzalez was a clear victory for Murdock, and a "disaster" for the 
> SavePacifica crowd. Anyone hear it? Any comments?
> 
> Doug
> 
> 

Leo Casey
United Federation of Teachers
260 Park Avenue South
New York, New York 10010-7272 (212-598-6869)

Power concedes nothing without a demand.
It never has, and it never will.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress.
Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet deprecate agitation are men who 
want crops without plowing the ground. They want rain without thunder and 
lightning. They want the ocean without the awful roar of its waters.
-- Frederick Douglass --

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20010316/63b651e2/attachment.htm>