Less freedom does not mean no freedom, it should not be necessary to say: no one would confuse contemporary France with Stalinist Russia. And it does not follow from France being less free in this respect that it is less free overall. But it is less free in this respect, and defendfers of laws that outlaw speech they find obnoxious are deceiving themselves if they think otherwise.
--jks
>in france, racists opinions are punished by law. opinions that openly
>threaten
>the constitution are as well (as far as i remember) and i think there are
>also
>provisions for fascist opinions (esp related to nazism etc). do you think
>french 'democracy'/society offers a 'less' free environment even though
>total
>freedom of opinion is not respected ?
>
>
>i am curious about this, because everywhere i go and if there are americans
>around it is immediately supposed that 'freedom of speech' is granted.
>
>isn't it that freedom of speech is used mostly by the bourgeois class to
>oppress and is left to the workers so that they think they can free
>themselves?
>
>does not putting limits to freedom of speech equate putting limits to
>capitalist exploitation (through racism/sexism etc) ?
>
>((((((((
>
>CB: Well, vous savez, Engels and Marx had this rough formula that England
>was first in economics, Germany first in philosophy, and France first in
>politics; and today France is ahead of the U.S. on this question of
>political speech.
>
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com