>Let's hope not, Rakesh...I'd certainly miss your presence here in
>Dougs' Salon (a.k.a. LBO-Talk). Don't let Doug bait you like that -
>I used to think that Doug was as poor on the rational/logical as he
>was good on the empirical, but, if the recent Monthly Review
>interview is any indicator, it is clear that Doug is as capable of
>logic and reason as the next person :-) What you are subject to
>here is the SalonMasters' Ruse of Unreason, doled out in a manner
>that borders (but only just!) on the supercilious...
Don't worry, the MR interview was an exception. I'm going back to my usual irrational/illogical self.
Sorry, but I'm not going to host - and pay for - a forum where someone impugns my ethics and those of someone I love (Liza Featherstone, not Christopher Hitchens). And I thought his assertions about Hitchens' motives were ugly and unfounded.
Superciliously,
Doug