>From: "Charles Brown" <CharlesB at CNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com>
>Subject: Re: judicial tyranny
>Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 13:41:14 -0400
>
>Well, there's a C- answer. Your misapprehension of my argument for banning
>fascistic racist speech does not make a very good demonstration of your
>claims as a federal clerk to have superior ability to apprehend legal
>argument and reasoning. If you are this mixed up on this issue, how can I
>believe your judgments about the the legal skills of the lawyers and judges
>you have been discussing on this thread ?
>
>CB
>
> >>> jkschw at hotmail.com 05/18/01 01:26PM >>>
>But you do like the Dennis result--not that the CP leaders went to jail,
>but
>the rule that speech with a bad tendency can be proscribed. It is the legal
>basis of your argument for banning fascist and racist speech. --jks
>
> >
> >((((((((
> >
> >CB: I take it you mean I like the fact that you include the Dennis case
>in
> >your list of worst cases, not that I like the Dennis result.
> >
> >How about _Schenck_ ? That's the very first First Amendment decision.
> >
> >
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>
>
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com