Scalia vs. Nabokov

Chuck Grimes cgrimes at rawbw.com
Thu Nov 1 12:51:53 PST 2001


Justice Antonin Scalia asked, "What great works of art would be taken away from us if we couldn't see minors copulating?" ...

"How about `Romeo and Juliet?'" Justice John Paul Stevens broke in with a smile. As the audience chuckled..., "Justices Weigh Law Barring Virtual Child Pornography" - Linda Greenhouse, N.Y. Times

``That kind of blows my mind. I mean this is something you'd expect some yahoo like, say, a TV preacher, to put out, but isn't Scalia supposed to be some kind of big-deal intellectual or something like that?...'' (WKiernan at concentric.net)

--------------------

In the vast medieval dungeons of the US legal community, Scalia is no doubt a shining beacon of light.

But I would ask what great legal principle is asserted by the court's opinion on viewing minors copulating?

Chuck Grimes



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list