Recounts finally released, Gore won

Chris Kromm ckromm at mindspring.com
Sun Nov 11 18:17:52 PST 2001


Here's Drudge's preview of story set to break tomorrow. Key point is that even if Gore had been able to carry out his strategy of partial recounts, he would have lost. So the hand-wringing over the Supreme Court decision is moot.

But combine this with the NY Times' excellent story this summer showing the illegal nature of Bush's counting of overseas ballots, and we emerge with a pretty clear picture of who won the Nov. 2000 elections.

The question is: how would the Gore/Lieberman administration be different? I can see some differences on domestic issues -- probably less corporate welfare/war profiteering, slightly less obscene environmental legislation. But foreign policy would likely be worse -- Lieberman calls for invading Iraq about every three days.

Chris (a Nader voter)

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN NOV 11, 2001 18:09:35 ET XXXXX

BIG MEDIA FLORIDA RECOUNT: GORE TOPPED BUSH IF ALL UNDER/OVER VOTES COUNTED; LEGAL STRATEGY DESTROYED CHANCES

**World Exclusive** **Must Credit DRUDGE REPORT**

A vote-by-vote review of untallied ballots in the 2000 Florida presidential election commissioned by the nation's main media outlets shows Al Gore edged ahead of George W. Bush "under all the scenarios for counting all undervotes and overvotes statewide," the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

APCNNNYTWASHPOSTLATIMESNEWSDAYCHICAGOTRIB will splash in Monday editions an election review which will ignite total controversy during a time of war, publishing sources told DRUDGE on Sunday.

MORE

Bush would have narrowly prevailed in the partial recounts sought by Gore, but Gore could have "reversed the outcome -- by the smallest of margins -- had he pursued and gained a complete statewide recount," according to one interpretation of the database compiled by the monstermedia consortium. [Each media outlet will produce a news analysis based on the database product.]

Under any standard that counted all disputed votes in Florida, Gore erased Bush's advantage and emerged with a tiny lead that ranged from 42 to 171 votes.

Gore followed a legal strategy that would have led to his defeat even if it had not been rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to one interpretation set for publication.

Gore sought a recount of a small number of disputed ballots while the review indicates his only chance lay in a course he advocated publicly but did not pursue in court -- a full statewide recount of untallied votes!

Gore took a 171-vote lead when the consortium tried to recreate how each county said it would handle a court-ordered statewide recount, and a 42-vote lead under what was called the "Palm Beach standard".

MORE

All outcomes were closer than the 537 votes of Bush's official victory, the media outlets will claim, while noting it would be impossible to interpret the survey results as definitive, with such narrow margins in all directions.

Impacting...



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list