Talking Points: Humor for the Day! (was: RE: NATO)

Jordan Hayes jmhayes at j-o-r-d-a-n.com
Wed Oct 10 21:31:43 PDT 2001


Snit continues:


> the propaganda is to portray us as the victim of agression

Isn't it a little late for that? I mean, Gee Dub already has like what, a 400% approval rating?


> it fits so nicely into the whole, 'why do they hate us' crap:
> this attack was so horrendous that FOR THE FIRST TIME we are going
> to be protected by NATO AWACS!

I think it's weird enough that no one seems to be worried about this expansion of military powers domestically (see for instance Wolfowitz's testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee where he suggests that Posse Comitatus be reconsidered http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8944-2001Oct4.html), let alone the idea that _foreign_ military forces would be used to "safeguard the homeland" . . .

Are people in the US really expected to be _thankful_ for this?

[ Kirsten reminds me that it's not "no one" ...

http://nyc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=12453&group=webcast ]

I would think that there would be a backlash against this move.

I guess we'll see.

/jordan



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list