From: "Luke Weiger" <lweiger at umich.edu>
>
> The only problem is that this particular formulation isn't what
relativism
> "really" means to most people. Indeed, as Fish stated, if the term
did mean
> that it would be just as accurate (and far less ambiguous) to call
it
> "serious thought."
>
> -- Luke
========== You mean relativism is a polysemous, floating signifier? :-)
Ian