Clerical Fascism & Totalitarianism

[Kelley]

At 11:17 AM 10/18/01 +0900, Charles Jannuzi wrote:
>In his own defense, Chip B writes:
> >OK Kelley, explain to me the point of having a serious >discussion with
> >someone who claims the terms you use have no meaning, >refuses to allow 
> you to define the terms, or consider other definitions, and 
> then >provides a tiny snippet of a quote and challenges you to rise above 
> your >sophomoric" level and state categorically (in 400 words or less) 
> whether or >not the person being quoted is representative of the term. 
> Its absurd and >insulting. It i s not a serious discussion. And in both 
> cases, nonetheless, I >attempted to >give an answer.

i couldn't possibly answer your question and, even if i could, i wouldn't 
since you didn't address what i said.

kelley